- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
11, Houston. Guidance is looking at the NOUN 40—49 stuff. We'll be back with you momentarily. Over.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Hello, Apollo 11. Houston. We'd like you to reject the NOUN 49 stuff on the DSKY right now, Mike, and try it again. Over.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Okay, Houston. Apollo 11. Here's another 49 for you. Are you getting it on the downlink?
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Hello, Apollo 11. Houston. We recommend you accept the NOUN 49 display on the DSKY now. Over.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Okay. It looks like an awful big one. We noticed that you'd moved star number 2 to the tail end of the listing, and we should be marking first on star 40. Did that have anything to do with it?
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Negative. We don't believe so, Apollo 11. We think that this is possibly due to some TLI dispersions, and it's probably satisfactory. So go ahead and accept this. It fits our criteria anyway that if you repeat the mark and you get an equivalent size to go ahead and accept it. And this is an equivalent size error. Over.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Hello, Apollo 11. Houston. We'd like you to recycle and do this one over again. Over.
- Buzz Aldrin (LMP)
-
Roger. Why don't you sing out when you think we've done enough battery charging on B.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Hello, Apollo 11. Houston. We'll be charging battery B up until the sleep period. We'll discontinue charging at that time. Also, at about 12 25 in the flight plan, we have battery A charge. That has been deleted. Over.
- Buzz Aldrin (LMP)
-
Roger. Understand. We'll charge until the sleep period on B and delete the battery A charge.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
And, Houston, Apollo 11. These AUTO optics maneuvers or P23's, AUTO maneuvers, don't seem to be going to the substellar point. Can you come up with the roll, pitch, and yaw angle for the substellar point on this star? It's our second star.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Hello, Apollo 11. Houston. Your angles in the flight plan we feel are still good, 198.6 130.7, 340.0. Just slightly off than those in the flight plan. Over.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Charlie, state those three angles one more time. I'd like to confirm them before I maneuver.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Roger. Roll and pitch are slightly off than what's in the flight plan, 11. Roll is now 198.6, pitch is 1307. Over.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Houston, Apollo 11. I think the problem here is that that attitude just is not too close to the substellar point. I'm having to maneuver quite a bit; and that's in progress now, so stand by for some marks.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Hello, Apollo 11. Houston. We've run the angles given in the flight plan for the P23 attitude through the machines down here, and they come up the same thing every time. We think everything's going correctly, Mike, and we're wondering if the nonsymmetrical horizon might by giving a problem. Over.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Yes, I'd say—It could be, Charlie. Stand by here. We'll get another mark for you.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Hello, Apollo 11. Houston. We recommend you accept the NOUN 49. Continue through your sequence of sightings, and then we'll analyze the data afterwards. Over.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Houston, Apollo 11. Star 40 has just disappeared now in the sextant. Could the trunnion angle 47—something be a little high?
Expand selection down Contract selection up - Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Roger. Forty-four is just not bright enough for this. There's a reddish glow filling the black area of the sextant, and the star is lost somewhere in there, and I cannot see it.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
And, Mike, we think these large DELTA-R's, NOUN 49, you're getting is really meaningful since it's been way before TLI since we had a state vector update; and we think it's normal. Over.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Okay. Could be, Charlie. Some of the early markings, I might not have had precisely the substellar point. I think as time goes by they've been coming more accurate but old Enif here is just flat invisible.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
And, Houston, Apollo 11. Understand that the same three gimbal angles you gave me should be valid for star 45 as well. Is that affirmative?
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Okay. Because there's quite a difference between the gimbal angles you have and the gimbal angles the program wants, but with inaccurate state vector, I'm inclined not to believe the program.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Roger. Same, Buzz. And, 11, the angles for you are 1978 for roll, 1285 pitch, 3400 yaw.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Okay. Just as a matter of comparison, P23 for this star would like to go to 235.66, 154.31, and 31365. Over.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Roger. We copy, 11. We understand that the program can give you almost an infinite combination of angles in P23, and it's not too unreasonable. If you'll stand by, we'll look at these that we see on the DSKY. Over.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Okay. Then in the meantime I'll just go ahead and maneuver to yours. 197.8, 128.5, and 340.0.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Okay, Charlie. If the attitude you gave me on star number 45—The reticle is off, I'd say, a good 30 degrees in roll, and the star is not in sight. Over.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Roger. Looks like to us we need a PROCEED, Mike, to get the sextant pointed at the star. Over.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
11, Houston. Those shaft and trunnion angles were exactly what we were computing on the ground. Over.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Okay. I have this star loud and clear now, Charlie, so I might as well do a bunch of marks on this one to get a good horizon count.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
It still looks like I'm far from the substellar point. However, I'm off quite a hit in roll.
- Charlie Duke (CAPCOM)
-
Roger. We'd like you to mark right where it is now, Mike, and we'd like two sets of marks on this. Over.
- Michael Collins (CMP)
-
Okay. Fine. But the reticle is not parallel to the horizon. I'd have to move off quite a hit in order to get it parallel to that.
Spoken on July 16, 1969, 8:42 p.m. UTC (55 years, 5 months ago). Link to this transcript range is: Tweet